Forum Index
this forum welcomes all forumers who appreciate decent and well thought out views and discussions. all forumers are encouraged to accept that different forumers have different views and often there is no absolutely right or wrong views.
Menu
 Forum IndexHome
FAQFAQ
MemberlistMemberlist
UsergroupsUsergroups
RegisterRegister
ProfileProfile
Log in to check your private messagesMessages
Log inLogin/Out

Quick Search

Advanced Search

Links
mysingaporenews
Singapore River Tour
Singapore Education
Singapore Orchids
littlespeck
ypapforum
Singapore Hosting
Sample Link 2
Sample Link 2

Who's Online
[ Administrator ]
[ Moderator ]


Google Search
Google

http://www.phpbb.com
Wake Up or sleep with the curse of the evil West/US forever.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bashing of western rule based world and non belligerence by a Brit

Watch this video and George Galloway saying what the western bourgeoisies refused to see in how belligerent they were but hiding under the fake image of peace loving and observance of rule of law in international relations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcyfVLMWqFI

The Institute of Art and Ideas
Published on Apr 25, 2019

Could a belligerent approach to foreign policy make for a safer world? This debate is also now available as a podcast episode of Philosophy for our Times on all podcast platforms https://soundcloud.com/instituteofart... ‘patricia may -

Mr Galloway is great. I wish he was Prime Minister. Brilliant.’

See how shocked the fake intelligentsia were reacting to the truth that they did not want to see but chose to believe in their lies and fake truths. It is so painful for them to sit there listening to George Galloway telling them right in their face and tearing up their myths and hypocrisies into pieces.

Galloway’s comment is in the first 6 minutes of the clip. Then listen to how he destroyed a young man’s belief in the American rule of law, the fake western rule of law etc etc. Galloway was furious about the fake belief in western international rule of law. What rule of law was there when there was no rule of law in the first place but the rule of belligerence?

After listening to Galloway, hopefully those people uttering about the rule based world would think twice before they opened their mouths. This is a very interesting anti populist,anti fake western views of the rule of law.

Asians and bananas would benefit from the truths spoken by Galloway and hopefully makes them less stupid in believing in the western lies.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The inherent biases of Asian thinking and perception of China and the USA
Hsien Loong has just given a speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Below are some quotes in his speech that revealed the inherent biases of Asians in their thinking with respect to China and the USA after decades of western influence and colonisation of their minds from reading western literature and narratives. Practically every Asian leader is affected by this kind of thinking with very few exceptions. They are blind to the flaws and crimes of the American Empire but acquired an acute sensitivity that everything associated with China is bad and negative but did not know why. I will treat each paragraph individually to explain the thinking behind it. The speech is reported in CNA online.
'SINGAPORE: While the “fundamental problem” between the US and China is a mutual lack of strategic trust that bodes ill for compromise or peaceful accommodation, a face-off between the two countries is not a “strategic inevitability”, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.'
What is the glaring point in this paragraph? The fundamental problem is a mutual lack of strategic trust? China mistrusted the Americans for sure, from the hot and cold war between the two with China being labelled as the devil and evil country since it became the PRC. But China was and is not the party that is putting up all the barriers and rhetoric of enmity between the two. It is the USA that is blocking China in everything, every field, every where. The Americans have been containing the Chinese, isolating it from the rest of the world, from the world economy until the rapproachment between Nixon and Mao and subsequently the joining of WTO.
Even then, till today, the Americans have been blocking China from participating in almost every thing related to high technology, in space, science and technology and military hardware. The Americans practically condemned China as their arch enemy. It is in their psyche since time immemorial. This is not the case from the perspective of China. The Chinese called the USA the 'beautiful country' 美国, instead of some derogatory name.
The lack of trust is heavily weighed on the side of the Americans. You can see how abusive and reckless the Americans are today in the South China Sea, in opposing BRI, AIIB, and now Huawei.
But when Asian leaders talked about the two super powers, they always take the stand that both are equally to be blamed and the responsibility lies on China, the bad one. The truth is that the Americans are the main cause of conflict and mistrust between the two super powers. Read this sentence below,

“In fact, the US has made clear its intention to compete robustly, though in a different mode than before.”
The Americans approach to compete is 'robust'? The Americans are warmongers, aggressive, provocative and belligerent all over the world, but described as 'robust' while China is always described as aggressive, belligerent, assertive and expansionist and wanting to eat up and conquer the world for building roads and rails and infrastructures and trade with the rest of the world.
Can see the inherent biases? The Americans are starting wars, conducting wars and provoking wars in the South China Sea and East China Sea and a full blown trade war with China with thousands of military bases all over the world.
“Chinese leaders have spoken up strongly in support of globalisation and a rules-based international order,” he added.

“China must now convince other countries through its actions that it does not take a transactional and mercantilist approach, but rather an enlightened and inclusive view of its long-term interests.”

What have China been doing all the while? Starting wars, provoking wars, inciting wars, like the Americans so it needs to change to convince the world that it is a friendly power? What china is doing in rebuilding the world is not enlighten enough?


“China should resolve these disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea),” he said.

“It should do so through diplomacy and compromise rather than force or the threat of force, while giving weight to the core interests and rights of other countries.

“Then over time it will build its reputation as a responsible and benevolent power that need not be feared. Instead China will be respected as a power that can be relied on to support a stable and peaceful region.”

These are the things that China is doing, the BRI that is reconnecting the whole of Asia, Europe and Africa and even to the two Americas, for trade. But the evil Americans have been badmouthing China and called this an aggressive and expansionist plan by China to conquer the world. And some stupid Asian leaders believe in this shit. Fortunately not all are that stupid to believe the Americans. The more than 160 countries participating in the BRI is confirmation that China is doing the right thing.

And there is the AIIB to finance infrastructure projects for Asian and African countries, cheap loans with no string attached as opposed to those from the World Bank, IMF and ADB controlled by the Americans and the West and Japan. The results of China's contribution to the world is profound but mostly unreported in the West. Read this,

'The world has also benefited from China’s development and success, Mr Lee said.

“China has become a massive production and manufacturing base, lowering costs for the world’s producers, first for labour-intensive goods, and now increasingly for high-tech and technology-intensive production,” he said.

“It is also a huge market, importing everything from commodities and electronic components to aircraft and fine wines.

“On the consumer side, billions of people worldwide buy all manner of products, from Barbie dolls and basketballs to drones and mobile phones, made in China, though often incorporating foreign components and technology.”

While China has done well at home by lifting more than 700m of its people out of poverty, it is also helping the rest of the world by lowering their cost of living, by producing cheap and reliable products to make their lives better, improve their lives with many consumables at prices they could afford, and the ease and convenience of road and rail connectivity.

And silly questions were asked with the same inherent biases by the audience. Here is one.
'After his speech, Mr Lee was asked about what he would say to Chinese leaders to increase the "comfort level" between China and other Asian countries.

Pointing to a television series shown in China which detailed how superpowers like the US and UK rose and fell, Mr Lee said "you must emerge peacefully and you must be able to do so in a way which wins acceptance from the global community".

"So, you may be the superpower but you have to have legitimacy, you have to have soft power; it’s not just force," he added.

Mr Lee said while China understands this in the "intellectual sense", it was very difficult to implement it practically. This is because countries would find it hard to put themselves in others' shoes and conclude differently about their own image, he added.'

"It’s very, very hard," Mr Lee stated. "For a big country, it’s even harder."

The Prime Minister said there’s something to be learnt from the US presence in Asia since the war, adding that the country has been welcomed and has "many friends" in the region.'

The question and reply said what? China is a bull in a china shop, a rogue, still did not know how to behave like the nice and peace loving Americans when they came to Asia! But they refused to recognise the fact that China has risen as a super power without firing a shot, without going to war, but peacefully. Yes. China has risen, peacefully.

Reflect on the situation when the Americans came, there was the evil and barbaric Japanese Imperial Army running amok in Asia, killing looting, plundering and seizing control of the countries. The Americans came at a time of despair and were seen as a savior. Further, those were times when many Asian countries were still non countries, non entity in a way, still colonies and then new countries that were hungry and need to rebuild their countries. They have no time to talk about challenging an imperial power but to rebuild their countries economically and as new nations.

The Americans came to restore a new peace and brought wealth and trade, allowing the rebuilding of countries in the region is a small way, nothing comparable to the Marshall Plan for Europe or the current BRI. The new countries made do with what they had and any little improvement is better than the days of wars and Japanese brutalities. Don't forget Vietnam, it was colonisation all over again if the Vietnamese did not fight and die for their country, colonisation by the Americans. South Korea and Japan are still semi colonies of the USA but pretending to be independent nations. They are still prevented from joining the BRI by the Americans and now Huawei's 5G.

China's emergence as a super power came at a time of peace and with each nation state very conscious of their nationality and sovereignty. The only dispute in the region is the South China Sea that the Americans are stirring all the shit, forgetting and refusing to tell the true story and agreements after the defeat of the Japanese invaders. The islands were returned to China by the victorious power over Japan.

Today, the problem is that the neigbouring countries are making claims and seizing these islands belonging to China with the encouragement of the Americans, to stir divisiveness, divide and rule. The greedy little countries around the South China Sea took the American bait and got more aggressive in their claims on Chinese islands with the Americans pointing the finger at China as the aggressor when the reality is the reverse.

The Americans would continue to paint China as an evil and expansionist power trying to conquer the world and the South East Asian countries in particular, and the silly Asian leaders cannot think further than this lie. To them, China is the big bad wolf and the Americans are the white knights to save them from the big bad wolf. The real wolf is in sheep's clothing that they could not see and also refuse to see and would love to sleep in the same bed.

Why must China convince the Asian countries when it is helping them in trade and infrastructure development? The only thing bad about China is because the Americans said so, white lies. When would Asian leaders see through the layers of American deceit and find their own truth? If they are unable to do so, they would constantly live their lives believing in American white lies. They would formulate policies the Americans wanted them to and regard China as the enemy when the real enemy is behind them urging them to go against China, and be an enemy of China.

China is trouble, Americans are the good guys despite the millions they killed and wounded in all the unceasing wars they started and engaged in Asia and the rest of the world.

Below is the latest from the American Secretary of War, Shanahan.

“[Some] actors undermine the system by using indirect, incremental actions and rhetorical devices to exploit others economically and diplomatically, and coerce them militarily. They destabilise the region, seeking to reorder its vibrant and diverse communities toward their exclusive advantage,”

Silly Asians and Asian leaders would read this as referring to China but not the Americans that are doing exactly these in a 'robust' way, sanctions, threats of war, regime change, coercion, conspiracies, bullying, provocations and false flag incidents etc etc.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

White men's mischief to invade Iran
After ratcheting up tension in an otherwise peaceful Persian Gulf when shippings flow smoothly, the Americans are accusing the Iranians of raising tension and threatening to invade Iran by their superior naval task force of two aircraft carriers and an assortment of naval and air resources deployed in the region. Anyone reading the western media would have no doubt that Iran is the trouble maker as that was what the western media been saying all the time. The truth is that the world's number one gangster has raised tension to a point of war, and now pretending to be the protector of peace and the sea lanes and twisting the arms of allies to provide military support to patrol the surrounding seas, to protect shipping when there was no need to except along the African coast against small time African pirates.

Now with all the military hardware in place for an invasion of Iran, the UN as usual is as mum as an dumbfuck, pretending not to see, not to know and not do say anything about the American aggression against Iran. The British, the other half of the world number one gangster is also moving in. And the Brits are using the same rhetoric, that Iran is raising tension and threatening British shipping, so they are sending their warships to the protect their shipping.

This is what was reported in the YahooNews.

'Britain said Friday it was sending a second warship to the Gulf and raising the alert level in the oil-rich region as tensions spike after Iranian gunboats threatened a UK supertanker.

The decision was disclosed as US President Donald Trump stepped up his war of words with the Islamic republic, which breached part of a nuclear accord already rejected by Washington.

"Iran better be careful," Trump told reporters outside the White House.

"They're treading on very dangerous territory. Iran, if you're listening, you better be careful."'

They are blaming the Iranians for confronting British ship but ignoring their own hostile act of seizing and arresting an Iranian ship near Gibraltar claiming that the tanker was delivering Iranian oil to Syria. How did an Iranian ship sailing from the Persian Gulf ended in Gibraltar on the way to Syria is as comical as you can get. It means the tanker had to sail around the Cape of Good Hope in South African, into the Atlantic Ocean and turn around through the Straits of Gibraltar to get to Syria instead of going through the Suez Canal.

The western lies are getting more desperate and ridiculous. And the rest of the world just took them without muttering a word. It is fait accompli. When the world's number one gangster said so, no one would dare to question the truth. It is best to keep quiet and turn to look the other way. Better still to join the hostile gangsters to attack Iran, provide military support in the farcical coalition force to protect shipping from being attacked by the American gangsters but blaming the Iranians for it.

What the world needs to be guarded against are the British and American pirates that went around seizing shipping in the high seas. The British seizure of the Iranian tanker is the latest incident. The Americans have been seizing ships from many countries as they want, calling themselves the international policeman but in reality international pirates, international gangsters of the high seas.

When would the UN form a coalition of forces to protect shipping from the American and British pirates?
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

British rogues still think they are colonial masters
LONDON: British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said London would respond in a considered but robust way to the seizure of a British tanker by Iranian guards, and warned that Tehran would be the biggest loser if freedom of navigation is restricted....

"This is completely unacceptable," Hunt said. "We will respond in a way that is considered but robust.

"We are not looking at military options, we are looking at a diplomatic way to resolve the situation but we are very clear that it must be resolved.

"If freedom of navigation is restricted Iran is the biggest loser, it is in their interests to resolve this situation as quickly as possible."

Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/britain-will-be-considered-but-robust-toward-iran-hunt-11738866

This rogue Brits still talked and acted like they owned the high seas in the 19th Century. They still behaved like pirates, hijacked an Iranian super tanker off Gibraltar as a right of white colonialists and imperialists. Now that the Iranians retaliated by arresting British tankers the Brits are ranting that it is not acceptable. So they want to attack the Iranians in collusion with the world's number gangster, the Americans. On its own, the Brits are no match for the Iranians. They rappelled their soldiers to seize the Iranian tankers, the Iranians did the same to seize the Brit's tankers. Want to try some more, send more warships to the Persian Gulf?

The Brits are still dreaming that they are still unchallenged super colonial power of the past. Little did they realised that militarily the Iranians are more powerful than the spent Royal Navy of today and would lick them anytime. God save the Queen if they dare to take on the Iranians today in the Persian Gulf. And their tankers in the Persian Gulf are floating ducks to be taken one by one by the Iranians if they wanted to

The Iranians even shot down an American drone and drove the Americans into desperation to shoot down their own drone believing and then pretending that it was an Iranian drone. With the backing of Russia and China, the Iranians would not be pushovers and would inflict severe damage and casualties to the rogue coalition banded together by the Evil Empire. The world can expect to see the sinking of an American aircraft carrier should war started in the region. The Americans and the West think they could hit others and others could not hit back. Iran would hit back with all they got, including hitting the most dangerous regional gangster Israel if needed to.

The Iranians are armed to the teeth, unlike Iraq, Libya or Syria. The fortunes of the world have changed sides. The West is in a steep decline and this could be the mother of all battles to mark the end of western dominance and supremacy in the world.

The opposition in the UK govt is warning the UK not to be dragged into another war by the Americans. Bolton and his gangsters are going everywhere to drag other countries to be the frontline gangsters to fight Iran on behalf of the Americans. Would any silly Asean countries become the dogs of the Americans and
stupidly become the enemies of the Iranians and become gun fodders?

Warning, the Americans and Europeans are very trigger happy to start wars and attack their victims on the understanding that their victims cannot hit back. Iran will hit back, North Korea will hit back, Russia will hit back, China too will hit back. Any silly country thinking of being partners to this crime against the Iranian people by joining the international gangsters must be prepared to have their men attacked and killed by the Iranians. The Americans and Brits know about this and are hesitating and would like other dull and stupid countries to be the scapegoat in their aggression against Iran.

Let's pray that when the aggressive international gangsters attacked Iran their aircraft carriers and warships would be sunk by Iranian missiles. These warships are within the range of DF26.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When lawlessness is fun
The big demonstrations in Hong Kong were amazing. For whatever reasons, the Hongkongers think they were strong enough to put pressure on Beijing by their show of force, that they were a different people, different from Chinese in China and deserved to be treated differently, have their own laws and their own country, an independent Hong Kong. The Hongkongers think Beijing would have to respect their rights and feelings and cut off Hong Kong from the mother land to be an independent country and not to bother that Hong Kong could be a cancer growing under the instigation and control of hostile forces to destabilize China.
The demonstrators, mostly young people, must be basking in their days of power, rioting, anarchy, that they were in control of their destiny, in control of Hong Kong, that the Hong Kong govt is hapless and could not do anything to them. China also could not do anything to them as the foreigners would be there to tear down China for taking actions against their lawlessness in breaking and tearing down Parliament House.
It was a great feeling, to be above the law, to break the law with impunity. It was power in the hands of the young mobsters. They even took liberty at the police, attacked them for wanting to maintain law and order. The young mobsters are the law, untouchable. They could decide what they want to do with Hong Kong, beat up anyone, tear down any building they want. They think they are the new masters of Hong Kong.
Then came 22 Jul, at the Yuen Long Train Station, another group of young mobsters appeared to challenge the young mobsters that had ran riot all over Hong Kong for the last few weeks. The new mobsters in white Ts took on the original mobsters in black Ts and beat them up. Many of the boys and girls were screaming and crying in fear and in pain, something alien to them. In the past weeks they were cheering and jeering, taunting and cursing at the govt and police and throwing stones at them in jubilant cries of power and triumph. They were the brave ones, the ones that were beating other people, throwing bottles and all kinds of things at their victims, including the police.
On 22 Jul, the table turned. They became the crying victims, squeezing into little corners in the train cabin to avoid being beaten. Some went on their knees crying and begging for the beating to stop. Some went accusing the police for not coming to their aid. The police were their victims, beaten by them, and they were demanding that the police must come and protect them from the white mobsters. Do they need the police, do they respect the police, do they know that they were the ones attacking the police just a few days earlier?
Lawlessness greeted with lawlessness. The hunters became the hunted. The thugs got beaten by the thugs. The brave front of invincibility and lawless became meek victims crying for help.
What happened? Where have the arrogance of lawlessness and brashness gone? Where have all the bravadoes and defiance gone? They went berserk over a few days of lawlessness until their roof came crashing down. It was unreal.
This is only the beginning. The lesson of growing up is just beginning. The time for naivety is over. Stop behaving like spoilt brats in the world of adults. Get real. Kids are kids and should not be playing with fire. The future of a nation of 1.35b people cannot be thrashed by a few young punks who think they own Hong Kong and want to decide the fate of Hong Kong and China. Hong Kong is China and would not be parted.
When lawlessness is fun
The big demonstrations in Hong Kong were amazing. For whatever reasons, the Hongkongers think they were strong enough to put pressure on Beijing by their show of force, that they were a different people, different from Chinese in China and deserved to be treated differently, have their own laws and their own country, an independent Hong Kong. The Hongkongers think Beijing would have to respect their rights and feelings and cut off Hong Kong from the mother land to be an independent country and not to bother that Hong Kong could be a cancer growing under the instigation and control of hostile forces to destabilize China.
The demonstrators, mostly young people, must be basking in their days of power, rioting, anarchy, that they were in control of their destiny, in control of Hong Kong, that the Hong Kong govt is hapless and could not do anything to them. China also could not do anything to them as the foreigners would be there to tear down China for taking actions against their lawlessness in breaking and tearing down Parliament House.
It was a great feeling, to be above the law, to break the law with impunity. It was power in the hands of the young mobsters. They even took liberty at the police, attacked them for wanting to maintain law and order. The young mobsters are the law, untouchable. They could decide what they want to do with Hong Kong, beat up anyone, tear down any building they want. They think they are the new masters of Hong Kong.
Then came 22 Jul, at the Yuen Long Train Station, another group of young mobsters appeared to challenge the young mobsters that had ran riot all over Hong Kong for the last few weeks. The new mobsters in white Ts took on the original mobsters in black Ts and beat them up. Many of the boys and girls were screaming and crying in fear and in pain, something alien to them. In the past weeks they were cheering and jeering, shouting and cursing at the govt and police and throwing stones at them in jubilant cries of power and triumph. They were the brave ones, the ones that were beating other people, throwing bottles and all kinds of things at their victims, including the police.
On 22 Jul, the table turned. They became the crying victims, squeezing into little corners in the train cabin to avoid being beaten. Some went on their knees crying and begging for the beating to stop. Some went accusing the police for not coming to their aid. The police were their victims, beaten by them, and they were demanding that the police must come and protect them from the white mobsters. Do they need the police, do they respect the police, do they know that they were the ones attacking the police just a few days earlier?
Lawlessness greeted with lawlessness. The hunters became the hunted. The thugs got beaten by the thugs. The brave front of invincibility and lawless became meek victims crying for help.
What happened? Where have the arrogance of lawlessness and brashness gone? Where have all the bravadoes and defiance gone? They went berserk over a few days of lawlessness until their roof came crashing down. It was unreal.
This is only the beginning. The lesson of growing up is just beginning. The time for naivety is over. Stop behaving like spoilt brats in the world of adults. Get real. Kids are kids and should not be playing with fire. The future of a nation of 1.35b people cannot be thrashed by a few young punks who think they own Hong Kong and want to decide the fate of Hong Kong and China. Hong Kong is China and would not be parted.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hong Kong, let it burn, let it burn
I suggested that China should do nothing and let the Hongkongers continue with their rampage and anarchy in the streets of Hong Kong, if this is what they want. China should stand back and see how creative and talented the Hongkongers are to continue to prosper the economy, without the special concessions and privileges offered by China.
The Hongkongers still believe that they are the greatest and smartest people and the prosperity of Hong Kong is the result of their ingenuity and enterprise and not the generosity of China. China just need to treat Hong Kong like any Chinese city, no special privileges and concessions, and no meddling with their politics and administration.
When Hong Kong fails, continues rioting and anarchy, China can then step in and offer amnesty to all Hongkongers to leave for greener pastures. A failed Hong Kong would give China the reason to declare its one country two systems a failure and take back Hong Kong now instead of after the 50 year agreement.
China can give the Hongkongers who wish to leave Hong Kong all the time in the world to leave, but take back Hong Kong and run it the China way. I think this is the fairest for both parties. The Hongkongers that want to leave will be assisted to leave. Those that wanted to stay would be welcomed to stay under One China One System. No buts or ifs. Hong Kong is a Chinese territory and must be one with China.
Let them go, let them be free wherever they want to go while Hong Kong returns to China for good. The twains shall never meet as they are just incompatible and the earlier the two are separated the better for all.
Let Hong Kong continues on its self destruct mode, if this is want they think is best for them.
Hong Kong, let it burn, let it burn
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The myths and hypocrisies of western rule based world and non belligerence

Watch this video and George Galloway saying what the western bourgeoisies refused to see in how belligerent they were but hiding under the fake image of peace loving and observance of rule of law in international relations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcyfVLMWqFI

The Institute of Art and Ideas
Published on Apr 25, 2019

Could a belligerent approach to foreign policy make for a safer world? This debate is also now available as a podcast episode of Philosophy for our Times on all podcast platforms https://soundcloud.com/instituteofart... ‘patricia may -
Mr Galloway is great. I wish he was Prime Minister. Brilliant.’

See how shocked were the fake intelligentsia reacted to the truth that they did not want to see but chose to believe in their lies and fake truths. It is so painful for them to sit there to listen to George Galloway telling them right in their faces and tearing up their myths and hypocrisies into pieces.

Galloway’s comment is in the first 6 minutes of the clip. Then listen to how he destroyed a young man’s belief in the American rule of law, the fake western rule of law etc etc. Galloway was furious about the fake belief in the western international rule of law. What rule of law was there when there was no rule of law in the first place but the rule of belligerence?

After listening to Galloway, hopefully those people uttering about the rule based world would think twice before they opened their mouths. This is a very interesting anti populist fake western views of the rule of law.

Asians and bananas would benefit from the truths spoken by Galloway and hopefully make them less stupid in believing in the western lies.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rohingyas – Evil men and women at work
Evilness in this world can come from men and women in white, wearing a halo over their heads and claiming to be doing the right thing and the good thing. The Rohingyas are victims of these men and women in white robes. They are being herded back to be raped, beaten, slaughtered and butchered by their ‘host’ country.
No, the Myanmese are not the evil ones. They are doing what is needed to rid their country of a people that don’t belong, cannot belong and cannot get along with the rest of the Myanmese. The Rohingyas have no place in Myanmar. Their religion and way of life are acrimonious and in conflict with the Myanmese. They were not supposed to be there but due to political reasons and persecution.
The Rohingyas are not to be blamed. The Myanmese are not to be blamed. Both of victims of the people in white robes. The ultimate reason for a long and endearing peace without more discrimination and bloodshed is to separate the two people that are as good as oil and fire. Put them together and they would burn and self destruct.
Why is it that the people in white robes, the so called angels of peace, the ‘good’ people, the caring and compassionate people, insist of shafting the Rohingyas into Myanmar to be discriminated, attacked and killed, and not to countries that have similar religion and way of life, with people that would accept them and willing to live with them? Why aren’t Bangladesh be taking back and resettle the Rohingyas in its own land when they would blend and mixed with the same people and live as one people?
Resettling the Rohingyas in Myanmar is like resettling the Jews in Israel, a cancer to the Myanmar that would fester and grow over time and would invite more cruelties and atrocities between the two people. The solution for a better life for the Rohingyas is not in Myanmar. The Rohingyas know this and refused to go back to Myanmar where tragedies would be repeated on them and their children and the children of their children.
For God’s sake, for goodness sake, shoot the men and women in white first, for insisting in prolonging and perpetuating this tragedy on the Rohingyas. Their fake solution is no solution. Their intention is evil to the core. They are planting the seed of hate in Myanmar for Myanmar to be engulfed in racial conflict and strife forever. The Rohingyas are their pawns to cripple and destroy Myanmar. The Rohingyas can be killed, discriminated and suffered in Myanmar is non issue as long as they achieved their goal to bog down Myanmar in perpetual war with the Rohingyas.
If the world wants to save the Rohingyas, the last place to put them in is Myanmar. We are all witnesses to the evilness premediated by the men and women in white robes in sentencing the Rohingyas to an endless torture, suffering, tragedy and painful death.
Evilness has its root it fake good intention in the guise of human rights.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hongkongers consuming too much opium and drugged
When the British and foreigners flooded China with opium in the 19th Century, a civilization of people went berserk, their minds went bland under the influence of the drug. From the emperors and mandarins to the farmers and coolies, all were drugged and stone. They could no longer think straight and any policy or action against the use of the drug would be opposed and undermined by the courts. They just want their drugs and nothing else. No personal dignity or pride as a people, as a civilization.
The situation in Hong Kong today is quite similar. This time the drug was fed to the unthinking and impressionable young and they spread the drug to their parents and grandparents. So deeply drugged, they could no longer think and die die would want their way. Many were in a trance, attacking the police as if they were enemies. And they expect the police not to hit back, the police cannot hit back because they are the police.
Can anyone imagine the silly old Hongkongers believing that they are fighting for one country two systems and not the destruction of Hong Kong and their way of life? They are having one country two systems at the moment and they are fighting to destroy it. Irrespective of whatever, the one country two systems will end in another 28 years. China will take back Hong Kong completely. The one country two systems is only good as a temporary measure and the 50 year break is to allow Hong Kong to gradually become one with China, not another state, not an independent Hong Kong. The Hongkongers must have no delusion that Hong Kong could still continue to be under one country two systems after the 50 years expired.
Hong Kong is a teeny weeny bit of China but an embarrassment that China would not allow to happen again. If Hong Kong is to be destroyed, if half of the Hongkongers were to perish for Hong Kong to become China, so be it. The concession of one country two systems were the last unequal treaty China had to sign as it was still not strong enough then to take Hong Kong back fully or risk a war with the West. Hongkongers must not deceive themselves or be deceived by others that they are so important to China and China would give away Hong Kong again.
In today’s context, China could even sail its navy to take England if it wanted to. China today is strong enough to take on the Americans and all its cronies combined, to protect its national interests and territorial integrity. There would be no concession or compromise when these are concerned. The drugged Hongkongers in their delusion may think that it is possible to have an independent Hong Kong to harm China.
Xi Jinping would say, over my dead body. The 1.4b Chinese would say, over our dead bodies. Wake up Hongkongers, give up whatever you are smoking and clear your thoughts. Hong Kong is an inalienable part of China and would be so forever. Still thinking the West would fight and die for a few silly Hongkongers?
China would now have all the reasons to remove the failing one country two systems and integrate Hong Kong fully as part of China. And all the vestiges of Britain, all the angmoh high court judges, civil servants and police officers would be sent back to England for good. And all the yellow skin British subjects would be allowed to migrate to their motherland in England, never to return.
The fate of Hong Kong’s future has changed. China is going all out to promote Shenzhen as the new commercial centre to replace Hong Kong. All Chinese capital and commerce would vacate Hong Kong and move into Shenzhen. All foreign companies would be advised to close down and move out of Hong Kong. Military law would be imposed in Hong Kong and the island locked down. In three months, Hong Kong would be a ghost town. All the generosities from China would be withdrawn and Hong Kong would be struggling to revive an economy that was not there without China.
Hongkongers smart? Hongkongers know what they want and they will get an independent Hong Kong? Not only that this wound not materialize, the prosperous Hong Kong would be a thing of the past. Hong Kong would be dismantled and rebuild from scratch. They have no chips to play, no bargaining power.
Well done, protesters and free Hong Kong movement. You have done it, by delivering Hong Kong to China 28 years prematurely and there would be no democratic Hong Kong that they built in their dreams under the hallucination of drugs. Would the Americans or British die for them in a war with China?
Singaporeans have a new member in its stupidity has no cure club.
PS. The clashes in the streets of Hong Kong had turned the streets into a war zone. The western media are still chirping that the protests were peaceful, not violent. Watch the video clips and see how the mobs attacked and beat up policemen and hurling bricks, petrol bombs and whatever they had at the police force. Peaceful, this is warfare.
The lack of casualties, injuries and bloodshed and death among the mobsters is a tribute to the great restraint exercised by the police force. In many countries, the violent mobs would have been shot and there would be bodies on the streets. The mobsters were so drugged and stoned that they did not know what the hell they were doing, fighting for an independent Hong Kong?
I am in praise of the Hong Kong Police Force, the men and women that faced the mobs and got beaten while restraining themselves from using more force than necessary to whip the daylight out of the mobsters.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hong Kong- Free enterprise
The 3 months of street demonstration and warfare have show how enterprising the Hongkongers were and how free is the economy of Hong Kong. While the western news media were churning up all the news about an oppressive police force, the threats to their political freedom and human rights, the reality is that the Hongkongers have never have life so good to them in their entire history. Under the British colonial masters, they did not have political freedom or human rights. They did not suffer much oppression then, saved from such brutal colonial oppression simply because they were too docile, accepted the rule of their colonial masters without protesting or rioting. They accepted the cramp and expensive housing that they are protesting today, the corruption of the colonial masters and the lack of political freedom and human rights then.

Today, the Hongkongers have many more times the political freedom and human rights under the Hong Kong govt. If they were to protest against the British colonial masters like they did today, they would have been machine gunned down like the British did to the Indians in India.

The grievances against poor housing were not the doing of the present govt, but the legacy of the colonial rule. This can be easily resolved by a massive resettlement programme with new cities in the neighbouring provinces. With the improvement in high speed trains they could be in Hong Kong in less than half an hour, free from the jams in crowded Hong Kong and living in spacious and reasonably priced housing. Their quality of life could take a quantum leap for the better, and they could have all the economic freedom and the new political freedom and human rights under a China that is racing ahead in economic growth and prosperity. They could travel the world freely like the Chinese and enjoy the growth and prosperity of a new China. But they chose to protest, to riot, to get themselves criminalised, harmed and maybe killed or deported eventually, when the good life is theirs to make.

I have digressed from the topic of free enterprise in Hong Kong today. Look at the following pictures of the police riot wear and those of the rioters. Both are equipped to the best they could get, money could buy, in free enterprise Hong Kong.

Hong Kong riot police wear. Pic from CNA

Rioters' riot wear. Pic from SCMP

Another rioter very well equipped and protector from tear gas and other material thrown at them by the police. Pic from SCMP

From the above pics, the rioters are just as well equipped and protected as the riot police. I can't call them protestors anymore. They have turned into rioting and bordering on being terrorists. They could buy all their protective gears easily from the streets of Hong Kong. There is apparently no control on these items. Even the dangerous laser lights could be purchased freely to be used against the police.

Where else would a govt allow such equipment to be sold on the streets like toys, easily available to the rioters, to be used against the police? Oops, someone told me another story. The rioters could get their gears easily because some parties are supplying them and the police or some quarters of the govt are closing an eye to this business.

What is real? Is the Hong Kong govt so stupid to allow these gears and dangerous equipment to be made available so easily, in abundance to the rioters? Is this free enterprise in Hong Kong or a conspiracy involving some parties in the govt, and the whole thing is a big wayang?

The best thing for China to do is to declare an emergency and remove all the colonialists in the govt. The Hongkongers are Chinese and should not be ruled by foreigners that filled the bench in the Supreme Court to rule against the interest of Chinese people, Hong Kong and China. This is the time for China to clean up Hong Kong from colonial rule. Hong Kong is not ruled by Hongkongers but by foreigners, with high court judges that are not Hong Kong citizens, not Chinese citizens, some holding dual nationality, some simply foreign citizens. This shameful existence of foreigners in the Supreme Court has to be cleansed immediately. Hong Kong is China and not a part of the British Empire.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Silly girly FM
Canada nominated a key economic advisor on Wednesday as its new ambassador to China, hoping to kickstart dialogue and ease a diplomatic standoff with the world’s second largest economy....

Relations nosedived after Canada detained Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou during a stopover in Vancouver last December. The United States wants to put her on trial for allegedly violating Iran sanctions and lying about it to US banks.

Nine days after her arrest, Beijing detained two Canadians — former diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor — and accused them of espionage, in a move widely viewed as retaliation....

“An expert in the region, he is exceptionally well-suited to represent Canada and advance Canadian interests at this critical time,” Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland said in a statement.

At a news conference, she added that Barton would have a direct line to Trudeau’s office, saying he “has that level of trust with the prime minister, and also with me.”

“I think this is also an important message to China of the importance that Canada places, that the prime minister places, on this difficult and critical relationship.”
© Agence France-Presse

This silly girly FM still cannot understand what she did wrong, what the boy PM did wrong and thinks she is sending a message to Beijing that all is well. Countries that have a FM like this does not need any enemy.

She still refuses to see the elephant in the room and thinks without releasing Meng Wanzhou she could get China to sleep with her.

Anyone wants to tell her go fuck spider? Or perhaps may ask her to come to Singapore to get a first hand lesson on how not to mess around with China. Who does she think she is? Because of her stupidity and the stupidity of the boy PM, Canada's economy is tanking and many farmers are suffering, trade with China is suffering, property prices falling, tourists avoiding Canada and hundreds of billions have gone down the drain. But these two studs are grinning everyday as if nothing has happened. For their egos and pride, the welfare of the Canadians can go to hell, never mind as long as the Americans say, good boy, good girl.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The delusional Hongkongers
First they protest about the extradition bill, claiming that China is a lawless country and they were fearing for their lives should this bill be passed and when they committed crimes they could be sent to China, to be trialed in China, a communist system, an authoritarian system that would not give them a fair trial, would abuse their human rights. Is China more lawless or Hong Kong today, after the continuous rioting and vandalism on the streets, the beating up of innocent people and police by the Hong Kong mobs?
Then they demanded for the resignation of the Chief Executive Officer of Hong Kong’s SAR, Carrie Lam. Then they wanted Hong Kong to be run as a different country, full universal suffrage, western democracy as if Hong Kong is a state that is on its own, nothing to do with China, China has no rights or authority over Hong Kong. Now they want independence, to have Hong Kong to themselves, breaking away from mainland China. A couple of millions of Hongkongers wanting to tell 1.4b Chinese and China that they want to take Hong Kong away as a separate entity!
As the weak Hong Kong govt fails to put down the rioting and vandalism on the streets of Hong Kong, the Hongkongers are embolden. They are starting to believe that the Hong Kong govt and China are hapless and helpless against them, that they are fearless and could run wild and wrestle Hong Kong away from China. China is so weak and would buckle under international pressure to let Hong Kong free as an independent state with a political system that is contrary to China and posing a threat to China as an alternative system, they believe and think they could do it.
Lately, the arrogance of false pride of the Hongkongers have gone a level higher. They are starting to exhibit a kind of superiority complex over mainland Chinese, ridiculing them, insulting them and even attacking them physically. Not only were the offices of Hong Kong govt being attacked, vandalized and burnt, they are now attacking Chinese businesses and the offices of Beijing in Hong Kong, and the latest, attacking the barracks of PLA troops. They are beating mainland Chinese on the streets. These silly Hongkongers did not know what it is like to incur the wrath of 1.4b mainland Chinese. They would be the ultimate punching bag when China decides to let them have it.
The Hongkongers think they are different from mainland Chinese, they are not Chinese, and telling the mainland Chinese in Hong Kong to go back to China in a derogatory way. They looked down on the mainland Chinese, despised the mainland Chinese, thinking that they are superior to them and did not want to have anything to do with them.
They have forgotten that their good fortune was a result of China and mainland Chinese. They did not know, or refused to know that their food, water and almost everything came from China. They think they are so clever that they can continue to prosper without China and mainland Chinese. Such insanity or stupidity cannot be cured sickness is unbelieveable in a people that is wholly dependent on China and mainland Chinese for their survival. They did not know that in the last 20 plus years, the mainland Chinese have overtaken them, surpassed them in almost everything. There are still many relatively poorer Chinese that came from the villages or less developed part of China. But the mainland Chinese living in the big cities are richer, wealthier and more sophisticated than them in many ways.
The Hongkongers are still burying their heads in the sand thinking that China is a backward country and mainland Chinese are poor country bumpkins. If they keep burying their heads in the sand, they would not know when they would be overtaken and replaced by the mainland Chinese. Their shortsightedness and false confidence and silly pride in themselves would soon come to pass and they would regret for their foolishness in a fast changing world and a fast changing China and Chinese people. How many more days can they dream that they are really superior to the mainland Chinese?
Their contempt and hatred for mainland Chinese and China would be their sin to reckon with. China was able to lock down Xinjiang and contain the terrorist acts of separatist movements in that region. It is so easy for China to lock down Hong Kong the way it locked down Xinjiang should it decide to do so.
Where can the Hongkongers run when China and the mainland Chinese decide that it is time to drive them out of Hong Kong? Even Li Ka Shing is making plans to leave Hong Kong and likely to end up as second class citizen in some western countries, with a lot of money but rootless, country less, living a meaningless existence. Many Hongkongers are going to end up this way, uprooted from their homes, from their motherland, to become non entities in some far away countries they could not called home.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hong Kongers - Good riddance

Anonymous said...
10 October 2019, 6:54 PM GMT+8

More than 42 per cent of Hongkongers want to emigrate because of the ongoing social unrest, according to a recent survey by Chinese University, compared with around a third of respondents who gave the same answer in December last year.

The Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at the university interviewed 707 individuals by phone between September 20 and 26, with 42.3 per cent indicating they would emigrate if they had a chance. In December 2018, 34 per cent respondents had given a similar response.

Of those who would like to move abroad, 23 per cent had already started planning for emigration.

They should have emigrated to UK before 1997 while they had the British Subject Identity Cards.

Now UK needs them to stay in Hongkong to create troubles for China and HK.
October 11, 2019 8:11 am

This is the best piece of news for China. China should apply the carrot and stick to these Hongkongers that want to leave Hongkong. China should grant an amnesty for the protesters arrested to leave Hong Kong for good, never to return. Or if they refuse to leave for their colonial master's land, China should cancel their citizenship and put them on a ship or plane on a one way ticket to anyway they wish to go.

For the rest of Hongkongers that are still demonstrating, China should make it easy for them to emigrate with an open door policy of immediate approval, no question ask. Just go. China does not need these rotten apples that think their ancestors are white men and let them go freely to join their white ancestors whichever they choose.

For those Hongkongers that choose to remain and acknowledge themselves as Chinese, they should be most welcome to stay in Hong Kong and any where in China. All other foreigners in Hong Kong's civil service, police force and the judiciary should be declared PNG and ask to leave Hong Kong immediately. Hong Kong and Hongkongers that regard themselves and Chinese need a new start as part of China.

Good riddance for those Hong Kongers that want to leave Hong Kong. They are no loss to China and to Hong Kong. The earlier these fake yellow skin angmohs leave Hong Kong the better it is for Hong Kong and China.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14152
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Descendants of convicts spreading lies about China
Sky News host Andrew Bolt says “the war has already started” with China, while Australia has “politicians who seem stunningly blind to the danger.”
In his talk show, this descendant of convicts claimed that China has stolen the South China Sea. Stolen the South China Sea from who? His twisted logic is understandable given his bad DNAs. You can’t expect descendants of convicts to tell the truth, to know the difference between truth and lies. They will lie even through the skin of their teeth. The islands in South China Sea were uninhabited islands and the Chinese have founded them many centuries ago under the principle of finders keepers. China did not steal the islands from anyone. Every littoral states of the South China Seas are claiming islands as their own.
What this son of convicts has conveniently forgotten is that their forefathers have stolen the continent of Australia from the original natives of Australia whom they called aborigines and ill treated them, abused them and treated them as sub human species. They were not the original people of Australia. Australia has its original people. But they came and they stole and they refused to talk about it, refused to admit it, refused to look at the mirror to see the real thieves.
The white Australians, like the white Americans, the white New Zealanders, stole the land of the natives of the respective countries and claimed them as their own. And they got the cheek to accuse China of stealing the islands in the South China Sea. This is the white lie they are spreading to the English speaking world, with many ignorant of history and unthinkingly accepting this twisted and distorted truth. And this Andrew Bolt spoke about it with eyes wide and unblinking believing that he was telling the truth.
Please go and ask your ancestors who stole Australia from the aborigines! As for the unthinking white bananas, please check your history and don’t accept this white lie blindly.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs All times are GMT + 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Page 10 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group. Hosted by Vodien Internet Solutions