Forum Index
this forum welcomes all forumers who appreciate decent and well thought out views and discussions. all forumers are encouraged to accept that different forumers have different views and often there is no absolutely right or wrong views.
Menu
 Forum IndexHome
FAQFAQ
MemberlistMemberlist
UsergroupsUsergroups
RegisterRegister
ProfileProfile
Log in to check your private messagesMessages
Log inLogin/Out

Quick Search

Advanced Search

Links
mysingaporenews
Singapore River Tour
Singapore Education
Singapore Orchids
littlespeck
ypapforum
Singapore Hosting
Sample Link 2
Sample Link 2

Who's Online
[ Administrator ]
[ Moderator ]


Google Search
Google

http://www.phpbb.com
US most irresponsible member of the International community
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 34, 35, 36
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

US Senate legislates Hong Kong as a colony of the USA
Photo credit to CNA
The US Senate unanimously passed a Hong Kong Bill to support protesters in Hong and warning China against a violent suppression of the demonstrations as if Hong Kong is a colony of the American Empire. The American Senators are voicing their strong support for the violent demonstrators and warned China against responding with violence. So what would the Americans do should China be so angered by this outside interference and whacked the demonstrators as they deemed fit? The Americans going to war with China?

The House said they were not kidding and also sanctioned Chinese officials deemed responsible for undermining Hong Kong's autonomy. 'Today's vote sends a clear message that the United States will continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong as they battle Beijing's imperialism,' said Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. 'The Chinese Communist Party's quest for power across the region is a direct threat to America's security and prosperity. Also reported in YahooNews, 'The Senate Foreign Relations Committee's top Democrat, Robert Menendez, added that the legislation "makes it clear that the US will stand firmly and unambiguously with the legitimate aspirations of the people of Hong Kong."

The cocky Americans still think they are the Empire that rules the world. American Imperialism is on the decline and they are madly clinging onto their past glory and military superiority without wanting to know that those days were gone.

Hong Kong is not an American colony and the Americans can do nothing about it except screaming like drunkards boasting about how powerful and strong they are. Hong Kong is a Chinese territory. Period. Stop behaving like Dennis the Menace and meddling with other country's internal affairs. Stop supporting violence and lawlessness.

Down with American Imperialism!

Would China spite Donald Trump with this stupid piece of legislation and prolong the trade negotiation without signing?
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Genocide did not happen in America?
The Nobel Peace Laureate defended Myanmar’s military crackdown against the Rohingya in August 2017. She told the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) her government was faced with an “internal conflict” and the military was called in to carry out a “clearance operation”.

Clearance operation or otherwise, she represented the military at ICJ whose operation that August had led to some 740,000 Rohingya fleeing neighbouring Bangladesh.

She said there was no genocide as alleged by the mostly Muslim Gambia lawyers who have brought the case to ICJ. It is said that ICJ will take a few years to come to a decision.

In any event, “Geno” means race or tribe and “cide” means to kill or exterminate. It is thus an extermination of a tribe or race like the Holocaust or the Tutsi slaughter. So, does the Rohingya qualify? Is it really an internal conflict?

The above are written by Michael Han in a post in the TRE in praising the Aung Sang Suu Kyi for her defence of her govt in their treatment of the Rohingyas. The West, masterminded by the Americans, are desperately trying to bring her govt down for not wanting to be the colony of the American Empire. After pushing her for a Nobel Prize, the Americans were disappointed that being a nationalist, she would think first for the good of her country and not the good of the American Empire. Now the Americans want to remove her from her office.

What is glaring in the above comment by Michael Han is the statement on genocide. Genocide is the wiping out or termination of a race or tribe. The Holocaust did not wipe out the Jews. The Tutsi slaughter too did not wipe out the Tutsi though came near to its definition with 800,000 Tutsi death in 100 days.

There is only one incident that befitted this definition of genocide, the wiping out of a race or a tribe. This was conducted by the white Europeans against the native Americans that occupied North America, their homeland. There were more than a 100m of them alive but now gone. Many tribes totally disappeared forever from the surface of the earth. That was genocide of continental scale. But the Americans and the Europeans would not want to mention it, not want to be reminded of it. The Asians, and Africans, fed by a diet of western media that would not want to report about this crime against humanity, would not know. Even if they know, they would not want to speak about it as it is politically incorrect to talk about the crimes of 'white angels' they so admired and adored as the saviour of humankind, the protectors of human rights.

So, to many people, there is no genocide in North America. They did not know, did not want to know, but happily aping the Americans and the West to accuse other Asian and African countries of genocide. And if you remind them of this genocide, they would utter in shock disbelief, where got? And if shown the facts, they would get angry as it is against their belief, white people are angels, cannot be devils, cannot be that evil. They chose to believe in their belief, like believing in a religion.

Stupidity has no cure among the Asians and Africans. Your education is futile if one cannot tell truth from lies, cannot accept facts and chooses to accept facts selectively to appease one's belief.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Killing of Iranian general - Act of international terrorists
Thousands more US troops were ordered to the Middle East on Friday after the United States assassinated Iran's military mastermind and Tehran promised "severe revenge."

President Donald Trump said top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was "terminated" when he was on the verge of attacking US diplomats but he insisted that Washington is not seeking to topple Iran's government.

"Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act," Trump said in Florida.

While referring to the key Iranian figure, killed in a US air attack earlier Friday in Iraq's capital Baghdad, as "sick," Trump attempted to lower tensions by insisting that he does not want war with Iran.

"We did not take action to start a war," he said, adding: "We do not seek regime change."

The Washington Examiner called the killing a "great moment for the United States that should be celebrated by all Americans". The Kremlin said the attack "grossly violates international law and should be condemned". The New York Post lead its front page with the headline "Blown Away".

Above from Yahoo News

The world's Number One international terrorists have done it again, with impunity, in the killing of an Iranian general in the name of peace. The justification is that the general was planning to attack Americans in Iraq. This kind of hypocritical reasoning is no different from accusing Saddam Hussein of possessing WMD to invade and kill him. The same kind of reason, if not condemned, would give the Americans the right to kill anyone in any country with such fabrication. Kim Jung Un would be next and so would be his generals and many other generals and leaders the American branded as their enemies.

Could Kim Jung Un and the Iranians attack and kill American generals for the same reason as many are plotting to attack their countries? Could the Bolivians, Venezuelans, the Cubans, the Russians and Chinese do the same, kill Americans for the same reason as the Americans are plotting daily to attack them? The Americans and the western media are reporting this as an acceptable way of killing people without condemnation.

Some western media are applauding this heinous crime, despite some American democrats calling it a war crime, and that it is a time for celebration, like celebrating Thanks Giving for the killing of American natives. And all the American lackeys and cronies either keep mum and quietly support the American evil crime without saying a word. This is how low the world has gone, allowing the American terrorists to start wars and killing people all over the world as they pleased, with no condemnation from the UN.

Killing the Iranian general is to prevent war, but a war has just started. This is a declaration of war by the Americans. Just like the invasion of Iraq, started a war and claiming that it was all for peace.

Want more white lies? Should Iran target all the hideous warmongers in Washington that have Arab and Muslim blood in their hands, from George Bush, Obama to Trump, the Pompeos, the Cheneys, the Navarros, the Boltons etc etc?

After this hideous act, the Americans knew that they are in big trouble and are wetting in their pants. They are asking the Iranians to respond proportionately and not an all out attack on any Americans on sight. Here are a few sentences from Yahoo News,

'After the attack, the Americans “resorted to diplomatic measures… on Friday morning”, Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi told state television that night.

They “even said that if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did”, he said, quoted on the broadcaster’s website....

But Fadavi said the United States was not in a position “to determine” Iran’s response.

“The Americans must await severe revenge. This revenge will not be limited to Iran,” he said.

“The ‘Resistance Front’, with a vast geography, is ready to materialise this revenge,” he added, referring to Iran’s allies across the Middle East.'

In order to stop the Americans from more of such indiscriminate attacks on Iranians and the Arabs and Muslims, the Iranians and the Resistance Front must be able to strike across the world and attack and kill as many Americans as possible. They need to tell the Americans that they can kill Americans as easily as the Americans killed Arabs and Muslims. Only such a message of violence for violence, a tooth for a tooth, would stop the Americans from more recklessness and killings of Arabs and Muslims.

The Americans would not dare to attack the North Koreans knowing that Kim would hit back with all he got. Iran and Arab and Muslim countries must understand this message. Weakness is an invitation for more attacks by the Americans.

As for Iran, without nuclear weapons to strike at US homeland, Trump is threatening to bomb 52 Iranian sites, including cultural heritage. This is how audacious this international terrorist country is. No condemnation at all from the world, and definitely not from its lackeys and cronies.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iran and the Arab and Muslim world can make the Americans pee in their pants
Have the Iranians, the Arabs and Muslims, and the rest of the world had had it enough of the international terrorists, ie the Americans? Is it about time that the Arab and Muslim world get their acts together to stop the Americans from killing them at will and then threaten them that should they retaliate or think of taking revenge, they would be bombed again and again and more Arabs and Muslims would have to die and their countries destroyed?

What would happen if the Arab and Muslim world were to issue a fatwa against the Americans? No need any fierce and sophisticated bombs. No need special and high tech equipment. Imagine what the world would be like if every American could be targeted and killed on sight? This is asymetrical warfare. This is guerilla warfare on a world stage, on a world scale. If the Americans think they can kill people freely, what if other people turn around to kill Americans freely? Is it wrong for the Arabs and Muslims to kill Americans as they liked like the Americans killing them as they liked?

In this new asymetrical war against the world's Number One International Terrorists, the Americans would be like the proverbial idiot living in a glass house and throwing stones at other houses. There are Iranians, Arabs and Muslims all over the world. There are Americans all over the world, in the Arab and Muslim world and also in the American homeland. The Iranians, Arabs and Muslims are also in the American homeland. What's is wrong if the Arabs and Muslims hit back?

What would happen to the Americans inside their homeland or outside their homeland or in Arab and Muslim land when they are the immediate targets of Iranians, Arabs and Muslims? How are they going to live their lives, getting around, working, doing business or leisure when they could be killed anytime anywhere?

The Iranians and Arab and Muslim countries may not be able to match the Americans in sophisticated weapons, in weapon drones and cruise missiles, in nuclear weapons. But if every man and woman is a walking weapon, just like suicide bombers, and every American, man or woman, adult or child is a target, life will become very miserable for the Americans all over the world and also in the American homeland. Do the Americans believe that it is their God damn right to kill Arabs and Muslims and the Arabs and Muslims cannot hit back, it is wrong to hit back at the American terrorists that feel so free to kill them?

When the Arabs and Muslims decide to hit back, there will be no where to run and no where to hide for the Americans. This would teach the Americans not to go around killing anyone they disliked and labelled as enemy and then go back to have their beers and hamburgers and sneered at their victims after killing them?
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Assassination of Soleimani a rude reminder to Kim Jong Un not to meet Trump again
The Trump administration claimed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was planning “imminent attacks” on US interests when it assassinated him. That lie was just destroyed, but not before countless corporate media outlets transmitted it to the public.
By Max Blumenthal

Desperate to justify the US drone assassination of Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo insisted that Washington had made an “intelligence-based assessment” that Soleimani was “actively planning in the region” to attack American interests before he was killed.
President Donald Trump justified his fateful decision to kill the Iranian general in even more explicit language, declaring that Soleimani was planning “imminent attacks” on US diplomatic facilities and personnel across the Middle East.

“We took action last night to stop a war,” Trump claimed. “We did not take action to start a war.”
Trump’s dubious rationale for an indisputably criminal assassination has been repeated widely across corporate media networks, and often without any skepticism or debate.

At a January 3 State Department briefing, where reporters finally got the chance to demand evidence for the claim of an “imminent” threat, one US official erupted in anger.

“Jesus, do we have to explain why we do these things?” he barked at the press.

Two days later, when Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi addressed his country’s parliament, Trump’s justification for killing Soleimani was exposed as a cynical lie.

According to Abdul-Mahdi, he had planned to meet Soleimani on the morning the general was killed to discuss a diplomatic rapproachment that Iraq was brokering between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Abdul-Mahdi said that Trump personally thanked him for the efforts, even as he was planning the hit on Soleimani – thus creating the impression that the Iranian general was safe to travel to Baghdad.

Source: https://thegrayzone.com/2020/01/06/soleimani-peace-mission-assassinated-trump-lie-imminent-attacks/

The above article made it clear to all the American treachery and deceit in the assassination of Soleimani. The Iraqi PM was duded by Trump to invite Soleimani to broker a peace mission in Iran Saudi relations. Soleimani flown to Baghdad thinking that he was there to negotiate for peace with the Saudi govt. He flew there in a commercial aircraft on a peace mission, not as what the Americans had been lying to the world. And on his arrival, the American drones were there waiting for him at the airport and took him and his entourage out in cold blood murder.

The Iraqi PM is furious for being made a fool of, and made use of, just like Justin Trudeau, by Trump, and became an accomplice to the assassination of Soleimani. How stupid can the Arabs be to continue to believe and trust the evil Americans? Soleimani would not have been so stupid to visit Baghdad if not of the invitation and the assurance that the evil Americans are supporting his visit and peace mission. Now the Iraqis are demanding that American troops leave Iraq but the Americans would not leave. They were invited to be in Iraq?

Kim Jong Un must be wary of the Americans and stop meeting Trump again if he treasures his life and not be assassinated in the next meeting.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14229
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Respect for International Law and the Rule of Law

This interview with the Iranian Foreign Minister again showed how stupid they are with regards to the world's Number One Terrorist State, the USA. In the interview the Iranian FM could say that Trump was fed the wrong information, ie, Trump was as innocent as an angel and as naive as a kindergarten child. Trump did not know what he was told, he did not know that the information was false, he did not bother to check, and he used it to kill Soleimani, just like Georgie Boy used the fabricated WMD information to invade Iraq and murdered Saddam Hussein. Come on, stop being silly. Trump knew exactly what he was doing and the fake intelligence that he got. He just wanted to use it to kill Soleimani, hopefully to take the heat off his impeachment charge.

The important points made by the Iranian FM were that Trump did not respect international law, did not respect the rule of law. Now, which country kpkb about respecting international law, the rule of law, and as a matter of principle must kpkb during the fake Hague Tribunal ruling against China?

Why is this country keeping quiet and not utter a sound about the rule of law and respecting international law. The key principles that Trump broke if not condemned, could be the same principls he breaks again to assassinate another national leader, and this country's leader could be on the list if the evil Americans decided to do so by fabricating another white lie when this country did not listen to their command.

Where are all the smart alecs that boasted of punching above their weight and as a matter of principle cannot keep their CB mouths shut? Why no condemnation?

Should Singapore be the ally of the world's number one terrorist and not violate its own principle of respecting international law and the rule of law?
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs All times are GMT + 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 34, 35, 36
Page 36 of 36

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group. Hosted by Vodien Internet Solutions