Forum Index
this forum welcomes all forumers who appreciate decent and well thought out views and discussions. all forumers are encouraged to accept that different forumers have different views and often there is no absolutely right or wrong views.
Menu
 Forum IndexHome
FAQFAQ
MemberlistMemberlist
UsergroupsUsergroups
RegisterRegister
ProfileProfile
Log in to check your private messagesMessages
Log inLogin/Out

Quick Search

Advanced Search

Links
mysingaporenews
Singapore River Tour
Singapore Education
Singapore Orchids
littlespeck
ypapforum
Singapore Hosting
Sample Link 2
Sample Link 2

Who's Online
[ Administrator ]
[ Moderator ]


Google Search
Google

http://www.phpbb.com
Wake Up or sleep with the curse of the evil West/US forever.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bashing of western rule based world and non belligerence by a Brit

Watch this video and George Galloway saying what the western bourgeoisies refused to see in how belligerent they were but hiding under the fake image of peace loving and observance of rule of law in international relations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcyfVLMWqFI

The Institute of Art and Ideas
Published on Apr 25, 2019

Could a belligerent approach to foreign policy make for a safer world? This debate is also now available as a podcast episode of Philosophy for our Times on all podcast platforms https://soundcloud.com/instituteofart... ‘patricia may -

Mr Galloway is great. I wish he was Prime Minister. Brilliant.’

See how shocked the fake intelligentsia were reacting to the truth that they did not want to see but chose to believe in their lies and fake truths. It is so painful for them to sit there listening to George Galloway telling them right in their face and tearing up their myths and hypocrisies into pieces.

Galloway’s comment is in the first 6 minutes of the clip. Then listen to how he destroyed a young man’s belief in the American rule of law, the fake western rule of law etc etc. Galloway was furious about the fake belief in western international rule of law. What rule of law was there when there was no rule of law in the first place but the rule of belligerence?

After listening to Galloway, hopefully those people uttering about the rule based world would think twice before they opened their mouths. This is a very interesting anti populist,anti fake western views of the rule of law.

Asians and bananas would benefit from the truths spoken by Galloway and hopefully makes them less stupid in believing in the western lies.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The inherent biases of Asian thinking and perception of China and the USA
Hsien Loong has just given a speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Below are some quotes in his speech that revealed the inherent biases of Asians in their thinking with respect to China and the USA after decades of western influence and colonisation of their minds from reading western literature and narratives. Practically every Asian leader is affected by this kind of thinking with very few exceptions. They are blind to the flaws and crimes of the American Empire but acquired an acute sensitivity that everything associated with China is bad and negative but did not know why. I will treat each paragraph individually to explain the thinking behind it. The speech is reported in CNA online.
'SINGAPORE: While the “fundamental problem” between the US and China is a mutual lack of strategic trust that bodes ill for compromise or peaceful accommodation, a face-off between the two countries is not a “strategic inevitability”, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.'
What is the glaring point in this paragraph? The fundamental problem is a mutual lack of strategic trust? China mistrusted the Americans for sure, from the hot and cold war between the two with China being labelled as the devil and evil country since it became the PRC. But China was and is not the party that is putting up all the barriers and rhetoric of enmity between the two. It is the USA that is blocking China in everything, every field, every where. The Americans have been containing the Chinese, isolating it from the rest of the world, from the world economy until the rapproachment between Nixon and Mao and subsequently the joining of WTO.
Even then, till today, the Americans have been blocking China from participating in almost every thing related to high technology, in space, science and technology and military hardware. The Americans practically condemned China as their arch enemy. It is in their psyche since time immemorial. This is not the case from the perspective of China. The Chinese called the USA the 'beautiful country' 美国, instead of some derogatory name.
The lack of trust is heavily weighed on the side of the Americans. You can see how abusive and reckless the Americans are today in the South China Sea, in opposing BRI, AIIB, and now Huawei.
But when Asian leaders talked about the two super powers, they always take the stand that both are equally to be blamed and the responsibility lies on China, the bad one. The truth is that the Americans are the main cause of conflict and mistrust between the two super powers. Read this sentence below,

“In fact, the US has made clear its intention to compete robustly, though in a different mode than before.”
The Americans approach to compete is 'robust'? The Americans are warmongers, aggressive, provocative and belligerent all over the world, but described as 'robust' while China is always described as aggressive, belligerent, assertive and expansionist and wanting to eat up and conquer the world for building roads and rails and infrastructures and trade with the rest of the world.
Can see the inherent biases? The Americans are starting wars, conducting wars and provoking wars in the South China Sea and East China Sea and a full blown trade war with China with thousands of military bases all over the world.
“Chinese leaders have spoken up strongly in support of globalisation and a rules-based international order,” he added.

“China must now convince other countries through its actions that it does not take a transactional and mercantilist approach, but rather an enlightened and inclusive view of its long-term interests.”

What have China been doing all the while? Starting wars, provoking wars, inciting wars, like the Americans so it needs to change to convince the world that it is a friendly power? What china is doing in rebuilding the world is not enlighten enough?


“China should resolve these disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea),” he said.

“It should do so through diplomacy and compromise rather than force or the threat of force, while giving weight to the core interests and rights of other countries.

“Then over time it will build its reputation as a responsible and benevolent power that need not be feared. Instead China will be respected as a power that can be relied on to support a stable and peaceful region.”

These are the things that China is doing, the BRI that is reconnecting the whole of Asia, Europe and Africa and even to the two Americas, for trade. But the evil Americans have been badmouthing China and called this an aggressive and expansionist plan by China to conquer the world. And some stupid Asian leaders believe in this shit. Fortunately not all are that stupid to believe the Americans. The more than 160 countries participating in the BRI is confirmation that China is doing the right thing.

And there is the AIIB to finance infrastructure projects for Asian and African countries, cheap loans with no string attached as opposed to those from the World Bank, IMF and ADB controlled by the Americans and the West and Japan. The results of China's contribution to the world is profound but mostly unreported in the West. Read this,

'The world has also benefited from China’s development and success, Mr Lee said.

“China has become a massive production and manufacturing base, lowering costs for the world’s producers, first for labour-intensive goods, and now increasingly for high-tech and technology-intensive production,” he said.

“It is also a huge market, importing everything from commodities and electronic components to aircraft and fine wines.

“On the consumer side, billions of people worldwide buy all manner of products, from Barbie dolls and basketballs to drones and mobile phones, made in China, though often incorporating foreign components and technology.”

While China has done well at home by lifting more than 700m of its people out of poverty, it is also helping the rest of the world by lowering their cost of living, by producing cheap and reliable products to make their lives better, improve their lives with many consumables at prices they could afford, and the ease and convenience of road and rail connectivity.

And silly questions were asked with the same inherent biases by the audience. Here is one.
'After his speech, Mr Lee was asked about what he would say to Chinese leaders to increase the "comfort level" between China and other Asian countries.

Pointing to a television series shown in China which detailed how superpowers like the US and UK rose and fell, Mr Lee said "you must emerge peacefully and you must be able to do so in a way which wins acceptance from the global community".

"So, you may be the superpower but you have to have legitimacy, you have to have soft power; it’s not just force," he added.

Mr Lee said while China understands this in the "intellectual sense", it was very difficult to implement it practically. This is because countries would find it hard to put themselves in others' shoes and conclude differently about their own image, he added.'

"It’s very, very hard," Mr Lee stated. "For a big country, it’s even harder."

The Prime Minister said there’s something to be learnt from the US presence in Asia since the war, adding that the country has been welcomed and has "many friends" in the region.'

The question and reply said what? China is a bull in a china shop, a rogue, still did not know how to behave like the nice and peace loving Americans when they came to Asia! But they refused to recognise the fact that China has risen as a super power without firing a shot, without going to war, but peacefully. Yes. China has risen, peacefully.

Reflect on the situation when the Americans came, there was the evil and barbaric Japanese Imperial Army running amok in Asia, killing looting, plundering and seizing control of the countries. The Americans came at a time of despair and were seen as a savior. Further, those were times when many Asian countries were still non countries, non entity in a way, still colonies and then new countries that were hungry and need to rebuild their countries. They have no time to talk about challenging an imperial power but to rebuild their countries economically and as new nations.

The Americans came to restore a new peace and brought wealth and trade, allowing the rebuilding of countries in the region is a small way, nothing comparable to the Marshall Plan for Europe or the current BRI. The new countries made do with what they had and any little improvement is better than the days of wars and Japanese brutalities. Don't forget Vietnam, it was colonisation all over again if the Vietnamese did not fight and die for their country, colonisation by the Americans. South Korea and Japan are still semi colonies of the USA but pretending to be independent nations. They are still prevented from joining the BRI by the Americans and now Huawei's 5G.

China's emergence as a super power came at a time of peace and with each nation state very conscious of their nationality and sovereignty. The only dispute in the region is the South China Sea that the Americans are stirring all the shit, forgetting and refusing to tell the true story and agreements after the defeat of the Japanese invaders. The islands were returned to China by the victorious power over Japan.

Today, the problem is that the neigbouring countries are making claims and seizing these islands belonging to China with the encouragement of the Americans, to stir divisiveness, divide and rule. The greedy little countries around the South China Sea took the American bait and got more aggressive in their claims on Chinese islands with the Americans pointing the finger at China as the aggressor when the reality is the reverse.

The Americans would continue to paint China as an evil and expansionist power trying to conquer the world and the South East Asian countries in particular, and the silly Asian leaders cannot think further than this lie. To them, China is the big bad wolf and the Americans are the white knights to save them from the big bad wolf. The real wolf is in sheep's clothing that they could not see and also refuse to see and would love to sleep in the same bed.

Why must China convince the Asian countries when it is helping them in trade and infrastructure development? The only thing bad about China is because the Americans said so, white lies. When would Asian leaders see through the layers of American deceit and find their own truth? If they are unable to do so, they would constantly live their lives believing in American white lies. They would formulate policies the Americans wanted them to and regard China as the enemy when the real enemy is behind them urging them to go against China, and be an enemy of China.

China is trouble, Americans are the good guys despite the millions they killed and wounded in all the unceasing wars they started and engaged in Asia and the rest of the world.

Below is the latest from the American Secretary of War, Shanahan.

“[Some] actors undermine the system by using indirect, incremental actions and rhetorical devices to exploit others economically and diplomatically, and coerce them militarily. They destabilise the region, seeking to reorder its vibrant and diverse communities toward their exclusive advantage,”

Silly Asians and Asian leaders would read this as referring to China but not the Americans that are doing exactly these in a 'robust' way, sanctions, threats of war, regime change, coercion, conspiracies, bullying, provocations and false flag incidents etc etc.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

White men's mischief to invade Iran
After ratcheting up tension in an otherwise peaceful Persian Gulf when shippings flow smoothly, the Americans are accusing the Iranians of raising tension and threatening to invade Iran by their superior naval task force of two aircraft carriers and an assortment of naval and air resources deployed in the region. Anyone reading the western media would have no doubt that Iran is the trouble maker as that was what the western media been saying all the time. The truth is that the world's number one gangster has raised tension to a point of war, and now pretending to be the protector of peace and the sea lanes and twisting the arms of allies to provide military support to patrol the surrounding seas, to protect shipping when there was no need to except along the African coast against small time African pirates.

Now with all the military hardware in place for an invasion of Iran, the UN as usual is as mum as an dumbfuck, pretending not to see, not to know and not do say anything about the American aggression against Iran. The British, the other half of the world number one gangster is also moving in. And the Brits are using the same rhetoric, that Iran is raising tension and threatening British shipping, so they are sending their warships to the protect their shipping.

This is what was reported in the YahooNews.

'Britain said Friday it was sending a second warship to the Gulf and raising the alert level in the oil-rich region as tensions spike after Iranian gunboats threatened a UK supertanker.

The decision was disclosed as US President Donald Trump stepped up his war of words with the Islamic republic, which breached part of a nuclear accord already rejected by Washington.

"Iran better be careful," Trump told reporters outside the White House.

"They're treading on very dangerous territory. Iran, if you're listening, you better be careful."'

They are blaming the Iranians for confronting British ship but ignoring their own hostile act of seizing and arresting an Iranian ship near Gibraltar claiming that the tanker was delivering Iranian oil to Syria. How did an Iranian ship sailing from the Persian Gulf ended in Gibraltar on the way to Syria is as comical as you can get. It means the tanker had to sail around the Cape of Good Hope in South African, into the Atlantic Ocean and turn around through the Straits of Gibraltar to get to Syria instead of going through the Suez Canal.

The western lies are getting more desperate and ridiculous. And the rest of the world just took them without muttering a word. It is fait accompli. When the world's number one gangster said so, no one would dare to question the truth. It is best to keep quiet and turn to look the other way. Better still to join the hostile gangsters to attack Iran, provide military support in the farcical coalition force to protect shipping from being attacked by the American gangsters but blaming the Iranians for it.

What the world needs to be guarded against are the British and American pirates that went around seizing shipping in the high seas. The British seizure of the Iranian tanker is the latest incident. The Americans have been seizing ships from many countries as they want, calling themselves the international policeman but in reality international pirates, international gangsters of the high seas.

When would the UN form a coalition of forces to protect shipping from the American and British pirates?
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

British rogues still think they are colonial masters
LONDON: British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said London would respond in a considered but robust way to the seizure of a British tanker by Iranian guards, and warned that Tehran would be the biggest loser if freedom of navigation is restricted....

"This is completely unacceptable," Hunt said. "We will respond in a way that is considered but robust.

"We are not looking at military options, we are looking at a diplomatic way to resolve the situation but we are very clear that it must be resolved.

"If freedom of navigation is restricted Iran is the biggest loser, it is in their interests to resolve this situation as quickly as possible."

Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/britain-will-be-considered-but-robust-toward-iran-hunt-11738866

This rogue Brits still talked and acted like they owned the high seas in the 19th Century. They still behaved like pirates, hijacked an Iranian super tanker off Gibraltar as a right of white colonialists and imperialists. Now that the Iranians retaliated by arresting British tankers the Brits are ranting that it is not acceptable. So they want to attack the Iranians in collusion with the world's number gangster, the Americans. On its own, the Brits are no match for the Iranians. They rappelled their soldiers to seize the Iranian tankers, the Iranians did the same to seize the Brit's tankers. Want to try some more, send more warships to the Persian Gulf?

The Brits are still dreaming that they are still unchallenged super colonial power of the past. Little did they realised that militarily the Iranians are more powerful than the spent Royal Navy of today and would lick them anytime. God save the Queen if they dare to take on the Iranians today in the Persian Gulf. And their tankers in the Persian Gulf are floating ducks to be taken one by one by the Iranians if they wanted to

The Iranians even shot down an American drone and drove the Americans into desperation to shoot down their own drone believing and then pretending that it was an Iranian drone. With the backing of Russia and China, the Iranians would not be pushovers and would inflict severe damage and casualties to the rogue coalition banded together by the Evil Empire. The world can expect to see the sinking of an American aircraft carrier should war started in the region. The Americans and the West think they could hit others and others could not hit back. Iran would hit back with all they got, including hitting the most dangerous regional gangster Israel if needed to.

The Iranians are armed to the teeth, unlike Iraq, Libya or Syria. The fortunes of the world have changed sides. The West is in a steep decline and this could be the mother of all battles to mark the end of western dominance and supremacy in the world.

The opposition in the UK govt is warning the UK not to be dragged into another war by the Americans. Bolton and his gangsters are going everywhere to drag other countries to be the frontline gangsters to fight Iran on behalf of the Americans. Would any silly Asean countries become the dogs of the Americans and
stupidly become the enemies of the Iranians and become gun fodders?

Warning, the Americans and Europeans are very trigger happy to start wars and attack their victims on the understanding that their victims cannot hit back. Iran will hit back, North Korea will hit back, Russia will hit back, China too will hit back. Any silly country thinking of being partners to this crime against the Iranian people by joining the international gangsters must be prepared to have their men attacked and killed by the Iranians. The Americans and Brits know about this and are hesitating and would like other dull and stupid countries to be the scapegoat in their aggression against Iran.

Let's pray that when the aggressive international gangsters attacked Iran their aircraft carriers and warships would be sunk by Iranian missiles. These warships are within the range of DF26.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When lawlessness is fun
The big demonstrations in Hong Kong were amazing. For whatever reasons, the Hongkongers think they were strong enough to put pressure on Beijing by their show of force, that they were a different people, different from Chinese in China and deserved to be treated differently, have their own laws and their own country, an independent Hong Kong. The Hongkongers think Beijing would have to respect their rights and feelings and cut off Hong Kong from the mother land to be an independent country and not to bother that Hong Kong could be a cancer growing under the instigation and control of hostile forces to destabilize China.
The demonstrators, mostly young people, must be basking in their days of power, rioting, anarchy, that they were in control of their destiny, in control of Hong Kong, that the Hong Kong govt is hapless and could not do anything to them. China also could not do anything to them as the foreigners would be there to tear down China for taking actions against their lawlessness in breaking and tearing down Parliament House.
It was a great feeling, to be above the law, to break the law with impunity. It was power in the hands of the young mobsters. They even took liberty at the police, attacked them for wanting to maintain law and order. The young mobsters are the law, untouchable. They could decide what they want to do with Hong Kong, beat up anyone, tear down any building they want. They think they are the new masters of Hong Kong.
Then came 22 Jul, at the Yuen Long Train Station, another group of young mobsters appeared to challenge the young mobsters that had ran riot all over Hong Kong for the last few weeks. The new mobsters in white Ts took on the original mobsters in black Ts and beat them up. Many of the boys and girls were screaming and crying in fear and in pain, something alien to them. In the past weeks they were cheering and jeering, taunting and cursing at the govt and police and throwing stones at them in jubilant cries of power and triumph. They were the brave ones, the ones that were beating other people, throwing bottles and all kinds of things at their victims, including the police.
On 22 Jul, the table turned. They became the crying victims, squeezing into little corners in the train cabin to avoid being beaten. Some went on their knees crying and begging for the beating to stop. Some went accusing the police for not coming to their aid. The police were their victims, beaten by them, and they were demanding that the police must come and protect them from the white mobsters. Do they need the police, do they respect the police, do they know that they were the ones attacking the police just a few days earlier?
Lawlessness greeted with lawlessness. The hunters became the hunted. The thugs got beaten by the thugs. The brave front of invincibility and lawless became meek victims crying for help.
What happened? Where have the arrogance of lawlessness and brashness gone? Where have all the bravadoes and defiance gone? They went berserk over a few days of lawlessness until their roof came crashing down. It was unreal.
This is only the beginning. The lesson of growing up is just beginning. The time for naivety is over. Stop behaving like spoilt brats in the world of adults. Get real. Kids are kids and should not be playing with fire. The future of a nation of 1.35b people cannot be thrashed by a few young punks who think they own Hong Kong and want to decide the fate of Hong Kong and China. Hong Kong is China and would not be parted.
When lawlessness is fun
The big demonstrations in Hong Kong were amazing. For whatever reasons, the Hongkongers think they were strong enough to put pressure on Beijing by their show of force, that they were a different people, different from Chinese in China and deserved to be treated differently, have their own laws and their own country, an independent Hong Kong. The Hongkongers think Beijing would have to respect their rights and feelings and cut off Hong Kong from the mother land to be an independent country and not to bother that Hong Kong could be a cancer growing under the instigation and control of hostile forces to destabilize China.
The demonstrators, mostly young people, must be basking in their days of power, rioting, anarchy, that they were in control of their destiny, in control of Hong Kong, that the Hong Kong govt is hapless and could not do anything to them. China also could not do anything to them as the foreigners would be there to tear down China for taking actions against their lawlessness in breaking and tearing down Parliament House.
It was a great feeling, to be above the law, to break the law with impunity. It was power in the hands of the young mobsters. They even took liberty at the police, attacked them for wanting to maintain law and order. The young mobsters are the law, untouchable. They could decide what they want to do with Hong Kong, beat up anyone, tear down any building they want. They think they are the new masters of Hong Kong.
Then came 22 Jul, at the Yuen Long Train Station, another group of young mobsters appeared to challenge the young mobsters that had ran riot all over Hong Kong for the last few weeks. The new mobsters in white Ts took on the original mobsters in black Ts and beat them up. Many of the boys and girls were screaming and crying in fear and in pain, something alien to them. In the past weeks they were cheering and jeering, shouting and cursing at the govt and police and throwing stones at them in jubilant cries of power and triumph. They were the brave ones, the ones that were beating other people, throwing bottles and all kinds of things at their victims, including the police.
On 22 Jul, the table turned. They became the crying victims, squeezing into little corners in the train cabin to avoid being beaten. Some went on their knees crying and begging for the beating to stop. Some went accusing the police for not coming to their aid. The police were their victims, beaten by them, and they were demanding that the police must come and protect them from the white mobsters. Do they need the police, do they respect the police, do they know that they were the ones attacking the police just a few days earlier?
Lawlessness greeted with lawlessness. The hunters became the hunted. The thugs got beaten by the thugs. The brave front of invincibility and lawless became meek victims crying for help.
What happened? Where have the arrogance of lawlessness and brashness gone? Where have all the bravadoes and defiance gone? They went berserk over a few days of lawlessness until their roof came crashing down. It was unreal.
This is only the beginning. The lesson of growing up is just beginning. The time for naivety is over. Stop behaving like spoilt brats in the world of adults. Get real. Kids are kids and should not be playing with fire. The future of a nation of 1.35b people cannot be thrashed by a few young punks who think they own Hong Kong and want to decide the fate of Hong Kong and China. Hong Kong is China and would not be parted.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hong Kong, let it burn, let it burn
I suggested that China should do nothing and let the Hongkongers continue with their rampage and anarchy in the streets of Hong Kong, if this is what they want. China should stand back and see how creative and talented the Hongkongers are to continue to prosper the economy, without the special concessions and privileges offered by China.
The Hongkongers still believe that they are the greatest and smartest people and the prosperity of Hong Kong is the result of their ingenuity and enterprise and not the generosity of China. China just need to treat Hong Kong like any Chinese city, no special privileges and concessions, and no meddling with their politics and administration.
When Hong Kong fails, continues rioting and anarchy, China can then step in and offer amnesty to all Hongkongers to leave for greener pastures. A failed Hong Kong would give China the reason to declare its one country two systems a failure and take back Hong Kong now instead of after the 50 year agreement.
China can give the Hongkongers who wish to leave Hong Kong all the time in the world to leave, but take back Hong Kong and run it the China way. I think this is the fairest for both parties. The Hongkongers that want to leave will be assisted to leave. Those that wanted to stay would be welcomed to stay under One China One System. No buts or ifs. Hong Kong is a Chinese territory and must be one with China.
Let them go, let them be free wherever they want to go while Hong Kong returns to China for good. The twains shall never meet as they are just incompatible and the earlier the two are separated the better for all.
Let Hong Kong continues on its self destruct mode, if this is want they think is best for them.
Hong Kong, let it burn, let it burn
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The myths and hypocrisies of western rule based world and non belligerence

Watch this video and George Galloway saying what the western bourgeoisies refused to see in how belligerent they were but hiding under the fake image of peace loving and observance of rule of law in international relations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcyfVLMWqFI

The Institute of Art and Ideas
Published on Apr 25, 2019

Could a belligerent approach to foreign policy make for a safer world? This debate is also now available as a podcast episode of Philosophy for our Times on all podcast platforms https://soundcloud.com/instituteofart... ‘patricia may -
Mr Galloway is great. I wish he was Prime Minister. Brilliant.’

See how shocked were the fake intelligentsia reacted to the truth that they did not want to see but chose to believe in their lies and fake truths. It is so painful for them to sit there to listen to George Galloway telling them right in their faces and tearing up their myths and hypocrisies into pieces.

Galloway’s comment is in the first 6 minutes of the clip. Then listen to how he destroyed a young man’s belief in the American rule of law, the fake western rule of law etc etc. Galloway was furious about the fake belief in the western international rule of law. What rule of law was there when there was no rule of law in the first place but the rule of belligerence?

After listening to Galloway, hopefully those people uttering about the rule based world would think twice before they opened their mouths. This is a very interesting anti populist fake western views of the rule of law.

Asians and bananas would benefit from the truths spoken by Galloway and hopefully make them less stupid in believing in the western lies.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redbean



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 14102
Location: singapore

PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rohingyas – Evil men and women at work
Evilness in this world can come from men and women in white, wearing a halo over their heads and claiming to be doing the right thing and the good thing. The Rohingyas are victims of these men and women in white robes. They are being herded back to be raped, beaten, slaughtered and butchered by their ‘host’ country.
No, the Myanmese are not the evil ones. They are doing what is needed to rid their country of a people that don’t belong, cannot belong and cannot get along with the rest of the Myanmese. The Rohingyas have no place in Myanmar. Their religion and way of life are acrimonious and in conflict with the Myanmese. They were not supposed to be there but due to political reasons and persecution.
The Rohingyas are not to be blamed. The Myanmese are not to be blamed. Both of victims of the people in white robes. The ultimate reason for a long and endearing peace without more discrimination and bloodshed is to separate the two people that are as good as oil and fire. Put them together and they would burn and self destruct.
Why is it that the people in white robes, the so called angels of peace, the ‘good’ people, the caring and compassionate people, insist of shafting the Rohingyas into Myanmar to be discriminated, attacked and killed, and not to countries that have similar religion and way of life, with people that would accept them and willing to live with them? Why aren’t Bangladesh be taking back and resettle the Rohingyas in its own land when they would blend and mixed with the same people and live as one people?
Resettling the Rohingyas in Myanmar is like resettling the Jews in Israel, a cancer to the Myanmar that would fester and grow over time and would invite more cruelties and atrocities between the two people. The solution for a better life for the Rohingyas is not in Myanmar. The Rohingyas know this and refused to go back to Myanmar where tragedies would be repeated on them and their children and the children of their children.
For God’s sake, for goodness sake, shoot the men and women in white first, for insisting in prolonging and perpetuating this tragedy on the Rohingyas. Their fake solution is no solution. Their intention is evil to the core. They are planting the seed of hate in Myanmar for Myanmar to be engulfed in racial conflict and strife forever. The Rohingyas are their pawns to cripple and destroy Myanmar. The Rohingyas can be killed, discriminated and suffered in Myanmar is non issue as long as they achieved their goal to bog down Myanmar in perpetual war with the Rohingyas.
If the world wants to save the Rohingyas, the last place to put them in is Myanmar. We are all witnesses to the evilness premediated by the men and women in white robes in sentencing the Rohingyas to an endless torture, suffering, tragedy and painful death.
Evilness has its root it fake good intention in the guise of human rights.
_________________
what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> World Affairs All times are GMT + 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Page 10 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group. Hosted by Vodien Internet Solutions